QSOL vs. LEGR
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEGR.
Performance
QSOL vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -43.81% return, which is significantly lower than LEGR's 9.24% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 9.24%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -43.81% | -4.28% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 9.24% | 1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and LEGR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LEGR
QSOL vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSOL | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than LEGR's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and LEGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -36.12% | -20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -4.26% | -48.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -6.59% | -27.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.31% | 14.54% | +57.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 17.09% | +55.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 20.33% | +51.98% |
QSOL vs. LEGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LEGR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSOL vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than LEGR's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.71% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and LEGR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.
LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.99% for QSOL.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LEGR is Blockchain. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.65% for LEGR.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and LEGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer