QSOL vs. EZPZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - QSOL tracks the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.

Performance

QSOL vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -41.51% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.

QSOL

• 1D: -4.67%
• 1M: -14.50%
• YTD: -41.51%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZPZ

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -18.55%
• YTD: -28.21%
• 6M: -33.71%
• 1Y: -39.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSOL vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	-41.51%	-0.92%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-28.21%	0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QSOL and EZPZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

QSOL vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSOL vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSOL	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.99	-0.61	-0.38

Drawdowns

QSOL vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSOL	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.82%	-52.38%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-52.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.82%	-51.59%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.98%	-21.72%	-10.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QSOL	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.59%	46.83%	+23.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.59%	47.65%	+22.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.59%	47.65%	+22.94%

QSOL vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QSOL vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSOL and EZPZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, QSOL and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QSOL or EZPZ?

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSOL or EZPZ?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QSOL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSOL or EZPZ?

QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between QSOL and EZPZ?

QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.19% for EZPZ.