QSIX vs. QDPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL).

QSIX and QDPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QSIX is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2024. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021.

Performance

QSIX vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QSIX vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	-5.58%	18.54%	4.66%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	-4.29%	16.52%	2.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's -4.29% return.

QSIX

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -5.58%
• 6M: -3.43%
• 1Y: 20.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDPL

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -1.77%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIX vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QSIX and QDPL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

QSIX

Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF

QDPL

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF

Return for Risk

QSIX vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX

QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 62
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 58
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QSIX	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.87	+0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	1.34	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.20	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.37	+0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	6.60	+0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QSIX vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and QDPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSIX	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.87	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.63	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and QDPL is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QSIX vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than QDPL's 5.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QSIX Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF	4.23%	4.02%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.13%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and QDPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSIX	QDPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-22.59%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-11.94%	+0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.24%	-6.08%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-5.30%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.48%	+0.62%

Volatility

QSIX vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 5.30%. This indicates that QSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSIX	QDPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	5.30%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	9.39%	+2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.44%	18.01%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.56%	15.12%	+4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.56%	15.12%	+4.44%