PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSIX vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSIX vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 5.40% return.


QSIX

1D
-2.89%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
15.33%
6M
13.92%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVO

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
5.40%
6M
4.24%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIX vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QSIX and DIVO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.55

The correlation between QSIX and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSIX vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIX
QSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIX vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSIXDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.93

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

10.48

+0.53

QSIX vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIX and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSIX vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIX and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSIXDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.72%

-30.04%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-5.95%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-1.61%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-2.60%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

1.66%

+1.26%

Volatility

QSIX vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.94%. This indicates that QSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSIXDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

2.94%

+5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

7.14%

+6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

9.21%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.76%

11.95%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

14.82%

+4.94%

QSIX vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSIX vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

QSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than DIVO's 6.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.43%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
QSIX
Pacer Metarus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF
3.96%4.02%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSIX and DIVO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSIX has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to DIVO (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIX dropped -20.72% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 1-year performance, QSIX leads with 32.02% vs 17.37% for DIVO. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QSIX has performed better with a 32.02% return vs 17.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QSIX.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 3.96% for QSIX.

QSIX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QSIX and 0.56% for DIVO.

QSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSIX and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer