PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QS vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QS vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QS achieves a -43.33% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 13.43% return.


QS

1D
-8.16%
1M
-14.67%
6M
-43.11%
YTD
-43.33%
1Y
-47.97%
3Y*
-16.85%
5Y*
-23.72%
10Y*

VYM

1D
0.47%
1M
0.89%
6M
9.47%
YTD
13.43%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QS vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QS
QuantumScape Corporation
-43.33%100.77%-25.32%22.57%-74.45%-73.72%757.36%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
13.43%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QS and VYM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QS vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QS
QS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QS vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.41

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

3.44

-4.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

12.78

-13.80

QS vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QS Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QS and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QS vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QS drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QS and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.36%

-56.98%

-40.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.98%

-6.69%

-61.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.93%

-14.46%

-59.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.45%

-15.84%

-75.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.52%

-0.13%

-95.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.66%

-7.16%

-78.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.28%

1.80%

+45.48%

Volatility

QS vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a higher volatility of 24.44% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 1.86%. This indicates that QS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.44%

1.86%

+22.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.27%

7.47%

+44.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.88%

10.21%

+80.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.27%

13.90%

+72.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.58%

16.28%

+89.30%

Dividends

QS vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

QS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QS
QuantumScape Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.26%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QS and VYM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QS has higher volatility (24.44%) compared to VYM (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QS dropped -97.36% vs VYM's -56.98%.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QS and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer