QS vs. BLNK
QS (QuantumScape Corporation) and BLNK (Blink Charging Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — QS in Auto Parts, BLNK in Specialty Retail. Over the past 5 years, QS returned -25.61%/yr vs -56.84%/yr for BLNK. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
QS vs. BLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QS achieves a -49.90% return, which is significantly lower than BLNK's -22.49% return.
QS
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -26.17%
- 6M
- -41.02%
- YTD
- -49.90%
- 1Y
- -36.80%
- 3Y*
- -25.29%
- 5Y*
- -25.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.02%
BLNK
- 1D
- 5.51%
- 1M
- -17.69%
- 6M
- -27.18%
- YTD
- -22.49%
- 1Y
- -45.63%
- 3Y*
- -56.64%
- 5Y*
- -56.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $761.98K | $662.38K | $1.54M | |
| $177.64M | $171.31M | $186.89M |
QS vs. BLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -49.90% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -73.72% | 240.52% |
BLNK Blink Charging Co. | -22.49% | -52.01% | -59.00% | -69.10% | -58.62% | -37.99% | 69.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between QS and BLNK is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between QS and BLNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
QS:
$3.21B
BLNK:
$61.70M
QS:
-$0.68
BLNK:
-$0.60
QS:
105.92
BLNK:
0.61
QS:
3.06
BLNK:
1.37
QS:
$29.52M
BLNK:
$103.40M
QS:
-$29.56M
BLNK:
$24.62M
QS:
-$375.21M
BLNK:
-$58.57M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QS vs. BLNK — Risk / Return Rank
QS
BLNK
QS vs. BLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QS | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.96 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.58 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.79 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QS vs. BLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QS drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNK drawdown of -99.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QS and BLNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QS | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.36% | -99.23% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.51% | -81.20% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.51% | -93.15% | +19.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.45% | -99.00% | +7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.04% | -99.15% | +3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -73.87% | -15.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.08% | 59.76% | -12.68% |
Volatility
QS vs. BLNK - Volatility Comparison
QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a higher volatility of 22.61% compared to Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) at 19.92%. This indicates that QS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QS | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.61% | 19.92% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.79% | 57.82% | -4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.67% | 93.91% | -8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.23% | 83.14% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.93% | 120.61% | -22.68% |
Dividends
QS vs. BLNK - Dividend Comparison
Neither QS nor BLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QS vs. BLNK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QuantumScape Corporation and Blink Charging Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QS and BLNK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QS has higher volatility (22.61%) compared to BLNK (19.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QS dropped -97.36% vs BLNK's -99.23%.
QS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QS and BLNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer