QRMI vs. TCAL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL).

QRMI and TCAL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. TCAL is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Mar 26, 2025.

Performance

QRMI vs. TCAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QRMI vs. TCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	-3.23%	4.74%
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	-2.47%	1.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly lower than TCAL's -2.47% return.

QRMI

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -3.01%
• YTD: -3.23%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 1.99%
• 3Y*: 6.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TCAL

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: -2.47%
• 6M: -2.85%
• 1Y: -1.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. TCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAL's 0.34% expense ratio.

QRMI

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF

TCAL

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF

Return for Risk

QRMI vs. TCAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 19
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 18
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TCAL

TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 9
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. TCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRMI	TCAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	-0.12	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	-0.09	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.99	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	-0.07	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.19	-0.22	+1.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRMI vs. TCAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the TCAL Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and TCAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRMI	TCAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	-0.12	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-0.08	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and TCAL is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QRMI vs. TCAL - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.76%, more than TCAL's 11.74% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.76%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	11.74%	8.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. TCAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than TCAL's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and TCAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRMI	TCAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-7.24%	-13.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	-7.24%	+2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.26%	-5.52%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-1.59%	-6.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	2.13%	-0.41%

Volatility

QRMI vs. TCAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 2.90%, while T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRMI	TCAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	3.36%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.87%	7.61%	-2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.74%	11.70%	-3.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.46%	11.68%	-3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.46%	11.68%	-3.22%