PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QRMI vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QRMI vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.50%3.76%14.72%3.41%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
-7.56%52.46%27.67%6.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly higher than GOOP's -7.56% return.


QRMI

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
4.38%
1M
-3.40%
YTD
-7.56%
6M
15.37%
1Y
68.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRMI vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRMIGOOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

2.41

-2.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

3.20

-2.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.42

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

3.03

-2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.59

12.30

-10.71

QRMI vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and GOOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRMIGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.41

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.26

-1.17

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and GOOP is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QRMI vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, less than GOOP's 13.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.66%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.52%11.79%13.73%2.06%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and GOOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMIGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-27.49%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-23.32%

+18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-15.24%

+11.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-6.44%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

5.75%

-4.01%

Volatility

QRMI vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 3.02%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QRMIGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

11.35%

-8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.93%

20.01%

-15.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.77%

28.37%

-20.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.46%

24.75%

-16.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.46%

24.75%

-16.29%