PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. AIYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QRMI vs. AIYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QRMI vs. AIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.50%3.76%14.72%2.20%
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
-33.80%-58.98%-14.74%-1.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly higher than AIYY's -33.80% return.


QRMI

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*

AIYY

1D
0.70%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-33.80%
6M
-47.29%
1Y
-59.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRMI vs. AIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIYY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. AIYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AIYY
AIYY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AIYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIYY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
AIYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIYY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. AIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRMIAIYYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

-1.07

+1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

-1.66

+2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.77

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

-0.86

+1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.59

-1.49

+3.08

QRMI vs. AIYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the AIYY Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and AIYY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRMIAIYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

-1.07

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.93

+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and AIYY is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QRMI vs. AIYY - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, less than AIYY's 204.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.66%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
204.65%168.33%98.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. AIYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum AIYY drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and AIYY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMIAIYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-79.48%

+58.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-68.33%

+63.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-78.38%

+74.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-38.37%

+30.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

39.39%

-37.65%

Volatility

QRMI vs. AIYY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 3.02%, while YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QRMIAIYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

10.84%

-7.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.93%

38.00%

-33.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.77%

55.58%

-47.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.46%

50.56%

-42.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.46%

50.56%

-42.10%