PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIYY vs. CONY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIYY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIYY achieves a -31.24% return, which is significantly lower than CONY's -26.79% return.


AIYY

1D
0.23%
1M
0.82%
YTD
-31.24%
6M
-33.10%
1Y
-58.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CONY

1D
-3.16%
1M
-11.77%
YTD
-26.79%
6M
-30.97%
1Y
-49.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIYY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
-31.24%-58.98%-14.74%0.41%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-26.79%-26.34%23.62%31.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AIYY and CONY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2023

0.50

The correlation between AIYY and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIYY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIYY
AIYY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AIYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIYY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AIYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIYY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIYY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIYYCONYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.86

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.78

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-1.24

+0.06

AIYY vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIYY Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is comparable to the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIYY and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIYY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIYY drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than CONY's maximum drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIYY and CONY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIYYCONYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.48%

-63.57%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.33%

-63.39%

-4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.54%

-58.53%

-19.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.68%

-22.83%

-18.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.68%

39.89%

+9.79%

Volatility

AIYY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) have volatilities of 15.30% and 15.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIYYCONYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.30%

15.74%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.30%

44.42%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.04%

57.79%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.29%

59.89%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.29%

59.89%

-9.60%

AIYY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIYY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

AIYY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

AIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 153.28%, less than CONY's 204.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AIYY
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF
153.28%168.33%98.26%0.00%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
204.97%192.07%155.66%16.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIYY and CONY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CONY has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to AIYY (15.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIYY dropped -79.48% vs CONY's -63.57%.

On 1-year performance, CONY leads with -49.52% vs -58.91% for AIYY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AIYY has been the lower-risk option at 15.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CONY has performed better with a -49.52% return vs -58.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIYY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 204.97%, compared with 153.28% for AIYY.

CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIYY and CONY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer