PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRFT vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QRFT vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QRFT vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
-3.78%17.95%21.36%13.40%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
9.04%49.85%30.98%19.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 9.04% return.


QRFT

1D
0.99%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-3.78%
6M
-1.77%
1Y
17.21%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*

CHAT

1D
3.95%
1M
0.86%
YTD
9.04%
6M
5.64%
1Y
87.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRFT vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QRFT and CHAT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

QRFT vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRFT
QRFT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QRFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRFT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QRFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRFT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRFT vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRFTCHATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

2.55

-1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

3.16

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

5.51

-4.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.57

15.32

-8.75

QRFT vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRFT and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRFTCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

2.55

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.33

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between QRFT and CHAT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QRFT vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than CHAT's 2.61% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.29%0.27%0.52%0.77%0.83%0.05%1.81%4.00%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
2.61%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QRFT vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, roughly equal to the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and CHAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QRFTCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.19%

-31.34%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-16.28%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-3.05%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-5.61%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

5.86%

-3.18%

Volatility

QRFT vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 5.66%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QRFTCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

13.18%

-7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

23.54%

-13.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.99%

34.44%

-15.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

29.33%

-11.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

29.33%

-9.09%