QRFT vs. BITQ
QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) and BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QRFT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while BITQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return. QRFT is actively managed, while BITQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QRFT returned 12.41%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for BITQ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QRFT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BITQ.
Performance
QRFT vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's 37.93% return.
QRFT
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- —
BITQ
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 37.93%
- 6M
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- 53.75%
- 3Y*
- 60.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
QRFT vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 12.70% | 17.95% | 21.36% | 24.16% | -22.69% | 23.72% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 37.93% | 18.00% | 46.97% | 246.83% | -83.86% | -7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRFT and BITQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between QRFT and BITQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
QRFT vs. BITQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QRFT
BITQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QRFT
BITQ
Financial Services
QRFT
BITQ
Communication Services
QRFT
BITQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
QRFT
BITQ
Industrials
QRFT
BITQ
-
Healthcare
QRFT
BITQ
-
Consumer Defensive
QRFT
BITQ
-
Energy
QRFT
BITQ
-
Basic Materials
QRFT
BITQ
-
Utilities
QRFT
BITQ
-
Real Estate
QRFT
BITQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRFT vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank
QRFT
BITQ
QRFT vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRFT | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.18 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.20 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 2.53 | +11.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRFT | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 0.97 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.07 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.07 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
QRFT vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and BITQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRFT | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.19% | -90.32% | +60.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -44.99% | +35.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | -51.22% | +31.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.20% | -90.32% | +62.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -15.21% | +14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -52.77% | +45.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 21.33% | -19.27% |
Volatility
QRFT vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 3.36%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 14.24%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRFT | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 14.24% | -10.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 42.58% | -32.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 55.93% | -42.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 67.18% | -49.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 67.21% | -47.11% |
QRFT vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRFT vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison
QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRFT and BITQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITQ has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to QRFT (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs BITQ's -90.32%.
On 5-year performance, QRFT leads with 12.41% vs 4.91% for BITQ. On fees, QRFT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QRFT has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QRFT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.
QRFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.
QRFT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BITQ is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.85% for BITQ.
QRFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRFT and BITQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer