BITQ vs. BLOK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both Blockchain funds. BITQ is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BITQ returned 4.41%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for BLOK. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BLOK.

Performance

BITQ vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 34.62% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK's 14.77% return.

BITQ

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 34.62%
• 6M: 25.61%
• 1Y: 49.39%
• 3Y*: 53.03%
• 5Y*: 4.41%
• 10Y*: —

BLOK

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 14.77%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 27.49%
• 3Y*: 48.25%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	34.62%	18.00%	46.97%	246.83%	-83.86%	-11.98%
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	14.77%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and BLOK is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021	0.96

The correlation between BITQ and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITQ vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BITQ	BLOK
Financial Services	71.6%	60.4%
Technology	25.5%	28.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	6.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITQ	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.71	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.17	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.14	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	0.77	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	1.67	+0.63

BITQ vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and BLOK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	BLOK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-73.33%	-16.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	-35.64%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.22%	-35.64%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.32%	-73.33%	-16.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.24%	-11.27%	-5.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.52%	-25.99%	-26.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.50%	16.48%	+5.02%

Volatility

BITQ vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 16.45% compared to Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) at 12.42%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	BLOK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.45%	12.42%	+4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.05%	29.64%	+13.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.94%	39.10%	+17.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.32%	42.53%	+24.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.24%	39.03%	+28.21%

BITQ vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITQ vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.62%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITQ and BLOK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, BITQ and BLOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BITQ or BLOK?

BITQ has higher volatility (16.45%) compared to BLOK (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

Which ETF is better, BITQ or BLOK?

On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 11.69% vs 4.41% for BITQ. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 12.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITQ or BLOK?

Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 4.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITQ or BLOK?

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITQ or BLOK?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

What is the main difference between BITQ and BLOK?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.70% for BLOK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.