QQXT vs. VOO
QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQXT returned 10.59%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQXT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
QQXT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, QQXT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.59%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
QQXT
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 0.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
QQXT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | -2.44% | 8.02% | 6.71% | 16.81% | -13.09% | 12.02% | 36.85% | 28.02% | -5.74% | 20.69% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXT and VOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and VOO has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQXT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQXT
VOO
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
QQXT
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
QQXT
VOO
Healthcare
QQXT
VOO
Consumer Defensive
QQXT
VOO
Communication Services
QQXT
VOO
Utilities
QQXT
VOO
Energy
QQXT
VOO
Technology
QQXT
VOO
Basic Materials
QQXT
VOO
Financial Services
QQXT
VOO
Real Estate
QQXT
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
QQXT
VOO
QQXT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQXT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 2.67 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 11.96 | -11.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQXT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.45% | -33.99% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -8.90% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | -18.69% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | -24.52% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | -33.99% | +3.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -3.14% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -3.68% | -4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 1.99% | +1.44% |
Volatility
QQXT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 3.00%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 4.83% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 9.82% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 12.46% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 16.91% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 18.02% | -0.53% |
QQXT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | 1.24% | 1.20% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 0.92% | 0.35% | 0.28% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.40% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXT and VOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to QQXT (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 10.59% for QQXT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.
QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VOO is S&P 500. QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQXT and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer