PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQXT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQXT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, QQXT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.59%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


QQXT

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.95%
1Y
0.72%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
10.59%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQXT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
-2.44%8.02%6.71%16.81%-13.09%12.02%36.85%28.02%-5.74%20.69%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and VOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and VOO has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQXT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQXT
VOO

Industrials

21.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.4%
9.8%

Healthcare

16.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

14.5%
4.5%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.5%

Utilities

7.3%
2.5%

Energy

3.6%
3.2%

Technology

3.6%
39.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Financial Services

1.8%
10.9%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.8%

Industrials

QQXT
21.8%
VOO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QQXT
16.4%
VOO
9.8%

Healthcare

QQXT
16.4%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

QQXT
14.5%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

QQXT
10.9%
VOO
10.5%

Utilities

QQXT
7.3%
VOO
2.5%

Energy

QQXT
3.6%
VOO
3.2%

Technology

QQXT
3.6%
VOO
39.1%

Basic Materials

QQXT
1.8%
VOO
1.7%

Financial Services

QQXT
1.8%
VOO
10.9%

Real Estate

QQXT
1.4%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQXT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQXT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQXTVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.35

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

2.67

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

11.96

-11.75

QQXT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQXTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-33.99%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-8.90%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-18.69%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-24.52%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-33.99%

+3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-3.14%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-3.68%

-4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

1.99%

+1.44%

Volatility

QQXT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 3.00%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQXTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

4.83%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

9.82%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

12.46%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

16.91%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

18.02%

-0.53%

QQXT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQXT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.24%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQXT and VOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to QQXT (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 10.59% for QQXT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VOO is S&P 500. QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQXT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer