QQXT vs. QQMG
QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQXT tracks the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index while QQMG tracks the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQXT returned 7.28%/yr vs 29.63%/yr for QQMG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQXT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQMG.
Performance
QQXT vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than QQMG's 21.86% return.
QQXT
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
QQMG
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 11.51%
- YTD
- 21.86%
- 6M
- 20.50%
- 1Y
- 44.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQXT vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | -1.57% | 8.02% | 6.71% | 16.81% | -13.09% | 0.19% |
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.86% | 22.16% | 25.66% | 55.00% | -31.56% | 5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXT and QQMG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and QQMG has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQXT vs. QQMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQXT
QQMG
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
QQXT
QQMG
Healthcare
QQXT
QQMG
Industrials
QQXT
QQMG
Consumer Defensive
QQXT
QQMG
Communication Services
QQXT
QQMG
Utilities
QQXT
QQMG
Technology
QQXT
QQMG
Energy
QQXT
QQMG
-
Financial Services
QQXT
QQMG
Basic Materials
QQXT
QQMG
Real Estate
QQXT
QQMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXT vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank
QQXT
QQMG
QQXT vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQXT | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.44 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 3.51 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 13.08 | -13.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQXT | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 2.66 | -2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.74 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
QQXT vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than QQMG's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and QQMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXT | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.45% | -35.43% | -22.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -12.67% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | -22.79% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -0.41% | -5.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -9.61% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.40% | -0.22% |
Volatility
QQXT vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 2.44%, while Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXT | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 4.76% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 12.90% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 16.77% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 23.60% | -7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 23.60% | -6.06% |
QQXT vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXT vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison
QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QQMG's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | 1.23% | 1.20% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 0.92% | 0.35% | 0.28% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXT and QQMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQMG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to QQXT (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs QQMG's -35.43%.
On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 29.63% vs 7.28% for QQXT. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 7.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.
QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.
QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.20% for QQMG.
QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQXT and QQMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer