PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQT vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
-4.89%14.04%4.51%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
-9.73%17.50%11.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return.


QQQT

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
-4.59%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.96%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
-9.73%
6M
-8.15%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQTSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.76

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.09

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.81

3.71

+1.11

QQQT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQTSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.76

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.79

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT and SCHG is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.01%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
23.01%21.27%10.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Drawdowns

QQQT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and SCHG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQTSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-34.59%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-16.41%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.78%

-12.51%

+3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-5.22%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

4.84%

-0.97%

Volatility

QQQT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) is 6.36%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that QQQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQTSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

6.77%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

12.54%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

22.45%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

22.31%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

21.51%

-0.88%