PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQT vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQT vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQQT having a 14.75% return and QQQY slightly higher at 15.28%.


QQQT

1D
-1.66%
1M
-1.02%
6M
12.63%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-1.69%
1M
-0.13%
6M
13.03%
YTD
15.28%
1Y
26.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
14.75%14.04%4.20%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
15.28%14.96%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT and QQQY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2024

0.90

The correlation between QQQT and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQT vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQTQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.39

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

9.39

-3.10

QQQT vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQT vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQTQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-19.05%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-11.14%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-3.54%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-2.91%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

2.83%

+0.96%

Volatility

QQQT vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) have volatilities of 7.88% and 8.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQTQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

8.13%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

14.50%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

16.59%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

15.57%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

15.57%

+5.22%

QQQT vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQT vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.30%, less than QQQY's 36.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
20.30%21.27%10.35%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
36.61%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, QQQT and QQQY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQY has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to QQQT (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQT dropped -22.50% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 26.48% vs 23.82% for QQQT. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQT has been the lower-risk option at 7.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 26.48% return vs 23.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 36.61%, compared with 20.30% for QQQT.

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for QQQT and 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQT and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer