QQQT vs. QB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQT (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQT is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. QQQT is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQT charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

QQQT vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly higher than QB's 10.47% return.

QQQT

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 9.90%
• YTD: 19.45%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 34.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	19.45%	9.29%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	10.47%	5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQT and QB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.79

QQQT vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQT	QB
Financial Services	99.8%	0.2%
Technology	54.2%	49.9%
Communication Services	15.5%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	8.6%
Healthcare	4.2%	5.3%
Industrials	2.8%	3.7%
Utilities	1.4%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.3%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQQT vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT

QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQT	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQT	QB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	3.17	-2.18

Drawdowns

QQQT vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQT	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-1.83%	-20.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.30%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-0.34%	-3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQT	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	5.75%	+8.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	5.75%	+14.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	5.75%	+14.49%

QQQT vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQT vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.16%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.62%	0.48%	0.00%
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF	19.16%	21.27%	10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQT and QB in my portfolio?

QQQT and QB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQT or QB?

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQT or QB?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQT or QB?

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 19.16%, compared with 0.62% for QB.

What is the main difference between QQQT and QB?

QQQT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for QQQT and 0.58% for QB.