PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQP vs. QBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQP vs. QBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than QBTX's -73.10% return.


QQQP

1D
-3.72%
1M
-3.56%
6M
19.17%
YTD
24.11%
1Y
47.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QBTX

1D
-14.26%
1M
-40.19%
6M
-77.33%
YTD
-73.10%
1Y
-57.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. QBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
24.11%60.80%
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
-73.10%339.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and QBTX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQP vs. QBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. QBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQPQBTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

-0.60

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

-0.79

+7.37

QQQP vs. QBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the QBTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and QBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. QBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum QBTX drawdown of -95.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and QBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPQBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-95.48%

+52.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

-95.48%

+70.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-93.79%

+84.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-58.76%

+51.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

72.21%

-64.97%

Volatility

QQQP vs. QBTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 14.77%, while Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a volatility of 49.96%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQPQBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

49.96%

-35.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.96%

144.46%

-115.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.67%

218.55%

-182.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.38%

238.15%

-193.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.38%

238.15%

-193.77%

QQQP vs. QBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQP and QBTX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

QQQP vs. QBTX - Dividend Comparison

QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.04%.


PositionTTM2025
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
49.04%13.20%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQP and QBTX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTX has higher volatility (49.96%) compared to QQQP (14.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs QBTX's -95.48%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 47.44% vs -57.25% for QBTX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 47.44% return vs -57.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQP and QBTX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 49.04%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQP and QBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer