QBTX vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, QBTX returned -33.74% vs 2279.34% for INTW. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

QBTX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -51.87% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.

QBTX

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: -37.54%
• YTD: -51.87%
• 6M: -69.24%
• 1Y: -33.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: 10.59%
• 1M: 28.23%
• YTD: 871.59%
• 6M: 897.00%
• 1Y: 2,279.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	-51.87%	339.28%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	871.59%	124.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and INTW is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

QBTX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX

QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 13
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBTX	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	15.45	-15.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	5.37	-3.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.68	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	46.81	-47.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.49	106.28	-106.77

QBTX vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTX and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTX	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.48%	-60.58%	-34.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.48%	-49.34%	-46.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.89%	0.00%	-88.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.21%	-29.71%	-27.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	69.03%	21.69%	+47.34%

Volatility

QBTX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 84.24% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) at 53.88%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTX	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	84.24%	53.88%	+30.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	150.32%	118.13%	+32.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	217.88%	149.77%	+68.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	241.46%	148.63%	+92.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	241.46%	148.63%	+92.83%

QBTX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBTX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.42%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	27.42%	13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTX and INTW in my portfolio?

QBTX and INTW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBTX or INTW?

QBTX has higher volatility (84.24%) compared to INTW (53.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, QBTX or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs -33.74% for QBTX. On fees, QBTX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, INTW has been the lower-risk option at 53.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBTX or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs -33.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBTX or INTW?

QBTX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBTX or INTW?

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 27.42%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between QBTX and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.