QQQN vs. PAMC

Last updated Jul 19, 2026

QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index while PAMC tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PAMC.

Performance

QQQN vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAMC

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -2.34%
• 6M: 9.33%
• YTD: 15.72%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQN vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	9.50%

QQQN vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQN	PAMC
Technology	47.3%	11.1%
Healthcare	19.9%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.7%	12.8%
Industrials	8.7%	25.7%
Communication Services	5.5%	0.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	4.0%
Utilities	1.6%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	3.4%
Energy	-	7.8%
Financial Services	-	19.1%
Real Estate	-	6.6%

Return for Risk

QQQN vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 50
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQN vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQN	PAMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.22	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.11	—

Drawdowns

QQQN vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PAMC drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and PAMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQN	PAMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-27.04%	+27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.22%	+3.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-7.35%	+7.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQN	PAMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	18.89%	-18.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	20.30%	-20.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	20.65%	-20.65%

QQQN vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQN vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison

QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.12%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QQQN or PAMC?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQN or PAMC?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQN or PAMC?

PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between QQQN and PAMC?

QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index, while PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.60% for PAMC.