PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQM vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQM vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return.


QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and RSP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.69

The correlation between QQQM and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQM vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQM
RSP

Technology

53.8%
19.6%

Communication Services

15.8%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.5%

Healthcare

4.2%
11.0%

Industrials

2.8%
14.1%

Utilities

1.4%
6.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.1%

Energy

0.6%
4.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
14.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
6.0%

Technology

QQQM
53.8%
RSP
19.6%

Communication Services

QQQM
15.8%
RSP
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQM
12.3%
RSP
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

QQQM
7.7%
RSP
6.5%

Healthcare

QQQM
4.2%
RSP
11.0%

Industrials

QQQM
2.8%
RSP
14.1%

Utilities

QQQM
1.4%
RSP
6.1%

Basic Materials

QQQM
1.1%
RSP
4.1%

Energy

QQQM
0.6%
RSP
4.5%

Financial Services

QQQM
0.2%
RSP
14.5%

Real Estate

QQQM
0.1%
RSP
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQM vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQMRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.30

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.49

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

9.48

+4.04

QQQM vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQMRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.70

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.52

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.57

+0.28

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQMRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-59.92%

+24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-7.85%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-17.81%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

-21.38%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.38%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-6.65%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.06%

+1.05%

Volatility

QQQM vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQMRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

2.56%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

8.29%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

11.56%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

16.18%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

18.35%

+3.77%

QQQM vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQM vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQM and RSP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 8.33% for RSP. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RSP is S&P 500. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.20% for RSP.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQM and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer