QQQM vs. RSP
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 18.07%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for RSP. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
QQQM vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return.
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
QQQM vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQM and RSP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.69 |
The correlation between QQQM and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQM vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQM
RSP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQM
RSP
Communication Services
QQQM
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
QQQM
RSP
Consumer Defensive
QQQM
RSP
Healthcare
QQQM
RSP
Industrials
QQQM
RSP
Utilities
QQQM
RSP
Basic Materials
QQQM
RSP
Energy
QQQM
RSP
Financial Services
QQQM
RSP
Real Estate
QQQM
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQM vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
QQQM
RSP
QQQM vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQM | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 2.49 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 9.48 | +4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQM | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 1.70 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.52 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.57 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
QQQM vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQM | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -59.92% | +24.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -7.85% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -17.81% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.04% | -21.38% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.38% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -6.65% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.06% | +1.05% |
Volatility
QQQM vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQM | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 2.56% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 8.29% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 11.56% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 16.18% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 18.35% | +3.77% |
QQQM vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQM vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQM and RSP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 8.33% for RSP. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RSP is S&P 500. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.20% for RSP.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQM and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer