QQQJ vs. RSP
QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQJ is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQJ returned 6.23%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
QQQJ vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 13.16% return.
QQQJ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 34.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.75%
RSP
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 20.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.82M | $6.21M | $6.07M | |
| $1.86B | $1.85B | $2.06B |
QQQJ vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 19.53% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 9.76% | 15.34% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 13.16% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 11.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQJ and RSP is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between QQQJ and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQJ vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQJ
RSP
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQJ
RSP
Healthcare
QQQJ
RSP
Industrials
QQQJ
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
QQQJ
RSP
Communication Services
QQQJ
RSP
Consumer Defensive
QQQJ
RSP
Utilities
QQQJ
RSP
Basic Materials
QQQJ
RSP
Financial Services
QQQJ
RSP
Energy
QQQJ
RSP
Real Estate
QQQJ
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQJ vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
QQQJ
RSP
QQQJ vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQJ | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.43 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 9.43 | +1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQJ vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQJ | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -59.92% | +20.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -7.85% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -17.81% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -21.38% | -18.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -1.23% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -6.61% | -8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.02% | +0.98% |
Volatility
QQQJ vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that QQQJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQJ | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.88% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 8.59% | +6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.15% | 11.76% | +7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 16.16% | +5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 18.28% | +3.68% |
QQQJ vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQJ vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.56% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQJ and RSP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQJ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.88% vs 6.23% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.56% for QQQJ.
QQQJ is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.20% for RSP.
QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQJ and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer