PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQJ vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 10.53% return.


QQQJ

1D
0.49%
1M
10.77%
YTD
23.83%
6M
23.61%
1Y
47.01%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*

RSP

1D
0.76%
1M
3.73%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.98%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
23.83%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.25%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.53%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and RSP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.81

The correlation between QQQJ and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQJ vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQJ
RSP

Technology

39.3%
19.6%

Healthcare

18.3%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
9.9%

Industrials

11.2%
14.1%

Communication Services

6.8%
3.7%

Basic Materials

2.7%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
6.5%

Energy

2.6%
4.5%

Utilities

2.6%
6.1%

Financial Services

1.0%
14.5%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Technology

QQQJ
39.3%
RSP
19.6%

Healthcare

QQQJ
18.3%
RSP
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQJ
11.4%
RSP
9.9%

Industrials

QQQJ
11.2%
RSP
14.1%

Communication Services

QQQJ
6.8%
RSP
3.7%

Basic Materials

QQQJ
2.7%
RSP
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

QQQJ
2.6%
RSP
6.5%

Energy

QQQJ
2.6%
RSP
4.5%

Utilities

QQQJ
2.6%
RSP
6.1%

Financial Services

QQQJ
1.0%
RSP
14.5%

Real Estate

QQQJ

-

RSP
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQJRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.64

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.19

10.05

+7.14

QQQJ vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQJRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.80

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.57

-0.08

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-59.92%

+20.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-7.85%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-17.81%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-21.38%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-6.65%

-9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.06%

+0.68%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.55%. This indicates that QQQJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

2.55%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

8.31%

+6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

11.56%

+6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

16.18%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

18.35%

+3.70%

QQQJ vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than RSP's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.71%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.48%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQJ and RSP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQJ has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to RSP (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.50% vs 7.79% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.71% for QQQJ.

QQQJ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.20% for RSP.

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQJ and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer