PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 11.12% return.


QQQJ

1D
0.49%
1M
10.77%
YTD
23.83%
6M
23.61%
1Y
47.01%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
0.47%
1M
4.82%
YTD
11.12%
6M
10.90%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
23.83%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.25%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and BBUS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.85

The correlation between QQQJ and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQJ
BBUS

Technology

39.3%
37.1%

Healthcare

18.3%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
9.4%

Industrials

11.2%
7.2%

Communication Services

6.8%
10.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
4.5%

Energy

2.6%
3.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.6%

Financial Services

1.0%
10.8%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

QQQJ
39.3%
BBUS
37.1%

Healthcare

QQQJ
18.3%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQJ
11.4%
BBUS
9.4%

Industrials

QQQJ
11.2%
BBUS
7.2%

Communication Services

QQQJ
6.8%
BBUS
10.8%

Basic Materials

QQQJ
2.7%
BBUS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

QQQJ
2.6%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

QQQJ
2.6%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

QQQJ
2.6%
BBUS
2.6%

Financial Services

QQQJ
1.0%
BBUS
10.8%

Real Estate

QQQJ

-

BBUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQJBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

3.06

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.19

14.04

+3.15

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQJBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.37

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.80

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.84

-0.35

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-35.35%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-9.21%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-19.01%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-25.46%

-14.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.28%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-5.45%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.00%

+0.74%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.84%. This indicates that QQQJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

2.84%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

8.97%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

11.87%

+6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

17.03%

+4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

19.59%

+2.46%

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.71%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQJ and BBUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQJ has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to BBUS (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.53% vs 7.79% for QQQJ. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQJ.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.71% for QQQJ.

QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.02% for BBUS.

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQJ and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer