QQQI vs. BTCI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 22.96% vs -41.35% for BTCI. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

QQQI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -24.35% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 0.87%
• 6M: 9.92%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 1Y: 22.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCI

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: -29.13%
• YTD: -24.35%
• 1Y: -41.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	11.53%	18.62%	4.84%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-24.35%	-1.09%	26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and BTCI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.47

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 58
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQI	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-1.04	+2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	-1.51	+3.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.83	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	-0.86	+3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.90	-1.42	+11.32

QQQI vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-48.42%	+28.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-48.42%	+38.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-44.06%	+42.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-17.03%	+14.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	29.12%	-26.80%

Volatility

QQQI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 6.94%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.94%	10.69%	-3.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	31.75%	-18.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.44%	39.98%	-24.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	40.13%	-22.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.60%	40.13%	-22.53%

QQQI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.62%, less than BTCI's 42.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	42.46%	36.46%	6.76%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.62%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQI and BTCI in my portfolio?

QQQI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQI or BTCI?

BTCI has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to QQQI (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs BTCI's -48.42%.

Which ETF is better, QQQI or BTCI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 22.96% vs -41.35% for BTCI. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQI or BTCI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 22.96% return vs -41.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQI or BTCI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQI or BTCI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 42.46%, compared with 13.62% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between QQQI and BTCI?

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.99% for BTCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.