PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQG vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQG vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQG vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-6.74%14.72%2.23%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
13.21%27.34%-3.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return.


QQQG

1D
3.98%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-6.74%
6M
-6.59%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GCOW

1D
0.85%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
13.21%
6M
20.65%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQG vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQG vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG
QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQGGCOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

2.27

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

3.01

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.44

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.77

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.99

14.12

-10.13

QQQG vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and GCOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQGGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

2.27

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.60

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and GCOW is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQG vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than GCOW's 4.39% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.06%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.39%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and GCOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQGGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-37.64%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-11.05%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.36%

-1.84%

-8.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-5.90%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.17%

+1.87%

Volatility

QQQG vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 4.03%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQGGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

4.03%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

7.90%

+7.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

13.89%

+11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

13.48%

+10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.62%

16.25%

+7.37%