QQQG vs. QQQI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 32.22% vs 17.94% for QQQI. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

QQQG vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a 24.01% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 6.90% return.

QQQG

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -3.40%
• 6M: 24.01%
• YTD: 24.01%
• 1Y: 32.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.92%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.08%
• 6M: 5.69%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	$294.07K	$388.51K	$471.81K
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	$341.25M	$334.46M	$358.36M

QQQG vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	24.01%	14.72%	1.68%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	6.90%	18.62%	7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and QQQI is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024	0.91

The correlation between QQQG and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQG vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQG	QQQI
Technology	76.3%	59.9%
Healthcare	9.7%	3.7%
Communication Services	4.4%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	6.5%
Energy	2.0%	0.5%
Industrials	2.0%	4.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 54
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 43
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQG vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.98	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.42	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.18	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	1.67	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.67	6.03	+0.64

QQQG vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-20.00%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-9.61%	-4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.40%	-5.92%	-3.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-2.27%	-1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.59%	2.67%	+1.92%

Volatility

QQQG vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 9.40% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.53%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.40%	6.53%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.39%	13.66%	+7.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	16.35%	+8.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.01%	17.75%	+7.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.01%	17.75%	+7.26%

QQQG vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QQQI's 14.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.38%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and QQQI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, QQQG and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQQG or QQQI?

QQQG has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to QQQI (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQG leads with 32.22% vs 17.94% for QQQI. On fees, QQQG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQG or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQG has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or QQQI?

QQQG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 14.38%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and QQQI?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.