QQQA vs. QRMI

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQA is passively managed, while QRMI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQA returned 30.35%/yr vs 6.70%/yr for QRMI. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QRMI.

Performance

QQQA vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 50.73% return, which is significantly higher than QRMI's 1.41% return.

QQQA

• 1D: -8.16%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 50.73%
• 6M: 51.41%
• 1Y: 73.96%
• 3Y*: 30.35%
• 5Y*: 12.63%
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 8.59%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQA vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	50.73%	9.87%	16.17%	24.98%	-29.08%	-1.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	1.41%	3.76%	14.72%	11.73%	-18.50%	-1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and QRMI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.68

The correlation between QQQA and QRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQA vs. QRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQA	QRMI
Technology	65.2%	53.8%
Communication Services	13.7%	15.8%
Energy	9.1%	0.6%
Healthcare	7.8%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	12.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

QQQA vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA

QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 83
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 44
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQA	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	1.48	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	1.99	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.30	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.11	1.71	+3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.91	7.50	+11.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQA vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and QRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQA	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	1.48	+1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.19	+0.31

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQA	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.44%	-20.95%	-17.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.54%	-5.04%	-9.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.84%	-8.43%	-22.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.86%	-1.16%	-7.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.66%	-7.97%	-7.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	1.15%	+2.77%

Volatility

QQQA vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 13.23% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 1.32%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQA	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.23%	1.32%	+11.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.90%	4.56%	+19.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.39%	5.82%	+21.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.08%	8.34%	+17.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.01%	8.34%	+17.67%

QQQA vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQA vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than QRMI's 12.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	0.07%	0.10%	0.09%	0.34%	0.28%	0.10%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.34%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQA and QRMI in my portfolio?

QQQA and QRMI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQA or QRMI?

QQQA has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to QRMI (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs QRMI's -20.95%.

Which ETF is better, QQQA or QRMI?

On 3-year performance, QQQA leads with 30.35% vs 6.70% for QRMI. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQA or QRMI?

Over the 3-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 30.35% return vs 6.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQA or QRMI?

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQA or QRMI?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.34%, compared with 0.07% for QQQA.

What is the main difference between QQQA and QRMI?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.60% for QRMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.