PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQA vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQA vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
1.42%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
-13.35%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%43.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return.


QQQA

1D
4.97%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
1.42%
6M
8.28%
1Y
24.06%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10Y*

QLD

1D
6.72%
1M
-10.26%
YTD
-13.35%
6M
-11.03%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
29.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQA vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQAQLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.43

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.49

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.51

4.88

+0.63

QQQA vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQAQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.53

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and QLD is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQA vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than QLD's 0.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.10%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.19%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and QLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQAQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-83.13%

+44.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-25.13%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.29%

-20.10%

+9.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-18.30%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

7.67%

-3.48%

Volatility

QQQA vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) is 11.40%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that QQQA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQAQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

12.96%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.70%

25.55%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.75%

44.91%

-16.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.37%

44.77%

-19.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.37%

44.47%

-19.10%