PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQA vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 65.37% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 42.06% return.


QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*

QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQA vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%43.95%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and QLD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.88

The correlation between QQQA and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQA vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQA
QLD

Technology

65.2%
53.8%

Communication Services

13.7%
15.8%

Energy

9.1%
0.6%

Healthcare

7.8%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
12.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

QQQA
65.2%
QLD
53.8%

Communication Services

QQQA
13.7%
QLD
15.8%

Energy

QQQA
9.1%
QLD
0.6%

Healthcare

QQQA
7.8%
QLD
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQA
4.2%
QLD
12.3%

Basic Materials

QQQA

-

QLD
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

QQQA

-

QLD
7.7%

Financial Services

QQQA

-

QLD
0.2%

Industrials

QQQA

-

QLD
2.8%

Real Estate

QQQA

-

QLD
0.1%

Utilities

QQQA

-

QLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQAQLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.41

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.11

3.42

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.85

11.92

+10.93

QQQA vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQAQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

2.70

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.60

-0.01

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and QLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQAQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-83.13%

+44.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-25.13%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-42.29%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

-63.68%

+25.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-18.17%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

7.20%

-3.32%

Volatility

QQQA vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQAQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

8.90%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

24.08%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.05%

31.85%

-5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.83%

44.74%

-18.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

44.56%

-18.79%

QQQA vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQA vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than QLD's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQA and QLD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs QLD's -83.13%.

On 5-year performance, QLD leads with 25.75% vs 14.74% for QQQA. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLD has performed better with a 25.75% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.95% for QLD.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQA and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer