QQQA vs. QLD
QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQA returned 14.74%/yr vs 25.75%/yr for QLD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.
Performance
QQQA vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 65.37% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 42.06% return.
QQQA
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- 23.31%
- YTD
- 65.37%
- 6M
- 67.98%
- 1Y
- 88.43%
- 3Y*
- 34.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
QQQA vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 65.37% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 8.43% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 43.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQA and QLD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between QQQA and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQA vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQA
QLD
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QQQA
QLD
Communication Services
QQQA
QLD
Energy
QQQA
QLD
Healthcare
QQQA
QLD
Consumer Cyclical
QQQA
QLD
Basic Materials
QQQA
-
QLD
Consumer Defensive
QQQA
-
QLD
Financial Services
QQQA
-
QLD
Industrials
QQQA
-
QLD
Real Estate
QQQA
-
QLD
Utilities
QQQA
-
QLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQA vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
QQQA
QLD
QQQA vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQA | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.41 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.11 | 3.42 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.85 | 11.92 | +10.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQA | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41 | 2.70 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.60 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
QQQA vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQA | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -83.13% | +44.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -25.13% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.84% | -42.29% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | -63.68% | +25.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.53% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -18.17% | +2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 7.20% | -3.32% |
Volatility
QQQA vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQA | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 8.90% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 24.08% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.05% | 31.85% | -5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 44.74% | -18.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 44.56% | -18.79% |
QQQA vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQA vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQA and QLD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 5-year performance, QLD leads with 25.75% vs 14.74% for QQQA. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLD has performed better with a 25.75% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.
QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.95% for QLD.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQA and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer