PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 20.50%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
-1.12%
1M
-4.49%
6M
10.14%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
21.39%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
20.50%
ALL TIME*
10.62%

SLYV

1D
0.18%
1M
0.18%
6M
12.38%
YTD
20.28%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
10.08%
ALL TIME*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.72B$27.46B$30.43B
$13.68M$20.85M$23.13M

QQQ vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
11.64%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
20.28%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and SLYV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.64

The correlation between QQQ and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
SLYV

Technology

60.9%
11.8%

Communication Services

13.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.1%

Healthcare

3.6%
6.4%

Industrials

2.7%
13.5%

Utilities

1.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.0%
5.6%

Energy

0.5%
7.7%

Financial Services

0.2%
21.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
7.9%

Technology

QQQ
60.9%
SLYV
11.8%

Communication Services

QQQ
13.1%
SLYV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
10.7%
SLYV
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
6.3%
SLYV
5.1%

Healthcare

QQQ
3.6%
SLYV
6.4%

Industrials

QQQ
2.7%
SLYV
13.5%

Utilities

QQQ
1.1%
SLYV
2.1%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.0%
SLYV
5.6%

Energy

QQQ
0.5%
SLYV
7.7%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
SLYV
21.4%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
SLYV
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.57

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

12.10

-5.92

QQQ vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than SLYV's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-61.15%

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-9.36%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-28.68%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-28.68%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-47.73%

+12.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-1.61%

-6.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.64%

-8.90%

-23.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.76%

+0.75%

Volatility

QQQ vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 3.61%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

3.61%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

11.21%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

17.81%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

21.70%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

23.89%

-1.43%

QQQ vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQ vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SLYV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and SLYV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to SLYV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.50% vs 10.08% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.50% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer