QQQ vs. SLYV
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 20.50%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for SLYV. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
QQQ vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 20.50%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- 20.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.62%
SLYV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 32.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.72B | $27.46B | $30.43B | |
| $13.68M | $20.85M | $23.13M |
QQQ vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 11.64% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 20.28% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and SLYV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.64 |
The correlation between QQQ and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
SLYV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ
SLYV
Communication Services
QQQ
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
SLYV
Healthcare
QQQ
SLYV
Industrials
QQQ
SLYV
Utilities
QQQ
SLYV
Basic Materials
QQQ
SLYV
Energy
QQQ
SLYV
Financial Services
QQQ
SLYV
Real Estate
QQQ
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
SLYV
QQQ vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.57 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 12.10 | -5.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than SLYV's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -61.15% | -21.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -9.36% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -28.68% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -28.68% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -47.73% | +12.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.20% | -1.61% | -6.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.64% | -8.90% | -23.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 2.76% | +0.75% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 3.61%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 3.61% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 11.21% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 17.81% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 21.70% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 23.89% | -1.43% |
QQQ vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SLYV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and SLYV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to SLYV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.50% vs 10.08% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.50% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer