QQQ vs. SIVR
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
QQQ vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 21.79%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively lower 14.22% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -22.74%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 85.68%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
QQQ vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and SIVR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.19 |
The correlation between QQQ and SIVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
SIVR
QQQ vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.90 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 4.12 | +7.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -75.85% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -45.33% | +33.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -45.33% | +22.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -45.33% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -45.33% | +10.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -41.89% | +38.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -47.83% | +15.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 20.85% | -17.65% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.56%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.37%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 16.37% | -8.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 59.11% | -45.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 59.76% | -42.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 36.48% | -13.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 32.03% | -9.65% |
QQQ vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and SIVR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to QQQ (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 14.22% for SIVR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SIVR is Silver. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.30% for SIVR.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer