QQQ vs. HDV
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 22.31%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for HDV. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
QQQ vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 14.11% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 22.31%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.36% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 22.31%
HDV
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
QQQ vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 14.11% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and HDV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.51 |
The correlation between QQQ and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
HDV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
HDV
Communication Services
QQQ
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
HDV
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
HDV
Healthcare
QQQ
HDV
Industrials
QQQ
HDV
Utilities
QQQ
HDV
Basic Materials
QQQ
HDV
Energy
QQQ
HDV
Financial Services
QQQ
HDV
Real Estate
QQQ
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
HDV
QQQ vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 4.00 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 11.07 | +2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -37.04% | -45.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -5.18% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -10.49% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -15.42% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -37.04% | +1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.31% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -3.08% | -29.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 1.87% | +1.33% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.28%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 3.28% | +4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 7.53% | +6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 9.79% | +7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 12.84% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 15.74% | +6.67% |
QQQ vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than HDV's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.56% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and HDV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to HDV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.31% vs 9.36% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.31% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HDV is Dividend. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.08% for HDV.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer