QQQ vs. CRM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 20.44%/yr vs 8.81%/yr for CRM. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

QQQ vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.18% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 20.44%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.81% annualized return.

QQQ

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -5.13%
• 6M: 10.89%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 22.35%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 20.44%
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

CRM

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: 12.74%
• 6M: -12.88%
• YTD: -30.18%
• 1Y: -28.16%
• 3Y*: -5.84%
• 5Y*: -5.00%
• 10Y*: 8.81%
• ALL TIME*: 19.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	$2.36B	$2.15B	$2.56B
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$30.32B	$28.40B	$31.45B

QQQ vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	12.26%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	-30.18%	-20.25%	27.76%	98.46%	-47.83%	14.20%	36.82%	18.74%	33.98%	49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and CRM is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2004	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between QQQ and CRM has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CRM

CRM Risk / Return Rank: 16
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQ vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQ	CRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	-0.69	+1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	-0.83	+2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.90	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	-0.65	+2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.00	-1.20	+7.20

QQQ vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and CRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQ	CRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.97%	-70.50%	-12.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-43.33%	+31.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.77%	-58.67%	+35.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.12%	-58.67%	+23.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	-58.67%	+23.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.69%	-49.34%	+41.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.62%	-16.37%	-16.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	23.55%	-19.81%

Volatility

QQQ vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 6.87%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQ	CRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	14.40%	-7.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.08%	33.51%	-17.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.38%	41.11%	-21.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.90%	37.77%	-14.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.50%	35.70%	-13.20%

Dividends

QQQ vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than CRM's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	0.93%	0.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQ and CRM in my portfolio?

QQQ and CRM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQ or CRM?

CRM has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs CRM's -70.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.