PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
-29.70%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-3.66%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -29.70% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.55%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.


CRM

1D
-0.23%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
-29.70%
6M
-20.85%
1Y
-30.62%
3Y*
-1.92%
5Y*
-2.93%
10Y*
9.55%

VOO

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.87

1.01

-1.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.13

1.53

-2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.23

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.55

-2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.65

7.31

-8.96

CRM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRM and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

1.01

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.71

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.79

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.83

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between CRM and VOO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CRM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VOO's 1.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
0.89%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

CRM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-33.99%

-36.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.51%

-11.98%

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

-24.52%

-34.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.62%

-33.99%

-24.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.98%

-5.55%

-43.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.83%

-3.72%

-12.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.29%

2.55%

+15.74%

Volatility

CRM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that CRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.35%

5.34%

+6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.89%

9.47%

+17.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.34%

18.11%

+17.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.01%

16.82%

+19.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.72%

17.99%

+16.73%