QQMG vs. UGA
QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 27.06%/yr vs 18.95%/yr for UGA. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
QQMG vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
QQMG
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 17.04%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 37.07%
- 3Y*
- 27.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
QQMG vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 17.04% | 22.16% | 25.66% | 55.00% | -31.56% | 5.26% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQMG and UGA is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.02 |
The correlation between QQMG and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQMG vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
QQMG
UGA
QQMG vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQMG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.17 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 9.39 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQMG vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQMG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -86.59% | +51.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -18.96% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -26.68% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -18.05% | +13.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -36.69% | +27.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 6.43% | -2.92% |
Volatility
QQMG vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) have volatilities of 9.05% and 9.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQMG | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 9.24% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 30.57% | -15.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 35.22% | -16.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 34.45% | -10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 37.22% | -13.43% |
QQMG vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQMG vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQMG and UGA have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to QQMG (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 27.06% vs 18.95% for UGA. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQMG has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 27.06% return vs 18.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
QQMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UGA is Oil & Gas. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.75% for UGA.
QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQMG and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer