QQMG vs. QTEC
QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQMG tracks the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index while QTEC tracks the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 29.47%/yr vs 32.59%/yr for QTEC. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QTEC.
Performance
QQMG vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 21.45% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's 43.17% return.
QQMG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 21.45%
- 6M
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 43.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTEC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 43.17%
- 6M
- 39.34%
- 1Y
- 64.90%
- 3Y*
- 32.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.85%
QQMG vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.45% | 22.16% | 25.66% | 55.00% | -31.56% | 5.01% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 43.17% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 4.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQMG and QTEC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between QQMG and QTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQMG vs. QTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQMG
QTEC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
QQMG
QTEC
Communication Services
QQMG
QTEC
Consumer Cyclical
QQMG
QTEC
Consumer Defensive
QQMG
QTEC
-
Healthcare
QQMG
QTEC
-
Industrials
QQMG
QTEC
Basic Materials
QQMG
QTEC
-
Utilities
QQMG
QTEC
-
Financial Services
QQMG
QTEC
-
Real Estate
QQMG
QTEC
-
Energy
QQMG
-
QTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQMG vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank
QQMG
QTEC
QQMG vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQMG | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 4.07 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 13.17 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQMG | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.84 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.60 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
QQMG vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and QTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQMG | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -58.86% | +23.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -16.03% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -29.00% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -1.08% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -9.89% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 4.94% | -1.54% |
Volatility
QQMG vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) is 4.80%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that QQMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQMG | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 7.51% | -2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | 18.24% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 22.97% | -6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 29.17% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 27.50% | -3.91% |
QQMG vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQMG vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison
QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQMG and QTEC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTEC has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to QQMG (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs QTEC's -58.86%.
On 3-year performance, QTEC leads with 32.59% vs 29.47% for QQMG. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQMG has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 32.59% return vs 29.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.
QQMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.
QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.57% for QTEC.
QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQMG and QTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer