QQJG vs. JHMM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM).
QQJG and JHMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQJG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 27, 2021. JHMM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. Both QQJG and JHMM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQJG vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQJG vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 1.44% | 18.05% | 14.67% | 17.20% | -27.69% | 0.91% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 2.50% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 3.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQJG achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 2.50% return.
QQJG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQJG vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQJG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQJG vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
QQJG
JHMM
QQJG vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQJG | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.94 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 1.43 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.40 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | 6.27 | +1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQJG | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.94 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.59 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQJG and JHMM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQJG vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
QQJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than JHMM's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 13.86% | 0.68% | 0.65% | 0.54% | 0.70% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
Drawdowns
QQJG vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQJG drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, smaller than the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQJG and JHMM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQJG | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.76% | -40.71% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -13.57% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -6.14% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -5.50% | -10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.04% | +0.08% |
Volatility
QQJG vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is 0.00%, while John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that QQJG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQJG | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.87% | -5.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 10.91% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 19.52% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 18.31% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 19.58% | +2.55% |