QQJG vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQJG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both funds - QQJG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FNCMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQJG returned 14.09%/yr vs 27.91%/yr for FNCMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQJG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQJG achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 16.82% return.

QQJG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNCMX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.17%
• YTD: 16.82%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 19.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	1.44%	18.05%	14.67%	17.20%	-27.69%	0.91%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	16.82%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QQJG and FNCMX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between QQJG and FNCMX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QQJG vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQJG

QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 45
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQJG	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.58	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.36	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.44	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	3.22	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.87	12.65	-3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQJG Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQJG and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQJG	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.58	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.58	-0.42

Drawdowns

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQJG drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQJG and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQJG	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.76%	-55.08%	+18.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.93%	-13.01%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.48%	-24.20%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	0.00%	-2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.32%	-7.86%	-7.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	3.30%	-1.15%

Volatility

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is 0.00%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that QQJG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQJG	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	4.12%	-4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	12.10%	-3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	16.23%	-2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.70%	22.46%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.70%	22.05%	-0.35%

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQJG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQJG vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

QQJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.44%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	13.86%	0.68%	0.65%	0.54%	0.70%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQJG and FNCMX in my portfolio?

QQJG and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQJG or FNCMX?

FNCMX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to QQJG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQJG dropped -36.76% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.