QQJG vs. FNCMX

In the year-to-date period, QQJG achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's -0.79% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

QQJG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QQJG Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQJG and FNCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QQJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than FNCMX's 0.61% yield.

The maximum QQJG drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQJG and FNCMX.

Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.