QQH vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - QQH tracks the HCM Defender 100 Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQH returned 21.78%/yr vs -1.05%/yr for KROP. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQH charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

QQH vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 11.60% return.

QQH

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 6.74%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 28.70%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: 12.07%
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 7.63%
• 3Y*: -1.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQH vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	6.74%	15.66%	33.64%	48.05%	-39.60%	14.02%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	11.60%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QQH and KROP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.39

The correlation between QQH and KROP shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQH vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQH

QQH Risk / Return Rank: 35
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 34

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 16
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQH vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQH	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.47	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	0.79	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.10	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	0.68	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	1.46	+3.27

QQH vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQH vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQH	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.87%	-62.08%	+20.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.18%	-11.29%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.84%	-28.70%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.53%	-51.27%	+43.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-44.71%	+31.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.08%	5.23%	+0.85%

Volatility

QQH vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) has a higher volatility of 11.82% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.54%. This indicates that QQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQH	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.82%	4.54%	+7.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.82%	12.48%	+5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.13%	16.19%	+6.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.02%	22.23%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.00%	22.23%	+2.77%

QQH vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQH vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than KROP's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.45%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	0.20%	0.21%	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQH and KROP in my portfolio?

QQH and KROP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQH or KROP?

QQH has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to KROP (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs KROP's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, QQH or KROP?

On 3-year performance, QQH leads with 21.78% vs -1.05% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQH or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, QQH has performed better with a 21.78% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQH or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQH or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.20% for QQH.

What is the main difference between QQH and KROP?

QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.