QQH vs. FTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
QQH and FTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQH is a passively managed fund by Howard Capital Management that tracks the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both QQH and FTEC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQH vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQH vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | -9.74% | 15.66% | 33.64% | 48.05% | -39.60% | 37.52% | 41.71% | 15.13% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | -7.30% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 14.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a -9.74% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's -7.30% return.
QQH
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -9.74%
- 6M
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- 19.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- -7.30%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.76%
- 10Y*
- 21.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQH vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQH vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
QQH
FTEC
QQH vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.08 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.66 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.81 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 5.63 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.08 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.59 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.85 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQH and FTEC is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQH vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than FTEC's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.23% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
QQH vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and FTEC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -34.95% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -16.26% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | -34.95% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.90% | -12.65% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -5.61% | -7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 5.22% | +0.19% |
Volatility
QQH vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is 6.43%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that QQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQH | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 7.97% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 16.35% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 27.51% | -5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 25.12% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 24.57% | +0.30% |