PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQEW vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQEW vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, QQEW has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 14.57%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


QQEW

1D
-0.78%
1M
14.51%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.58%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
14.57%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQEW vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
12.15%14.22%7.00%33.31%-24.59%17.75%37.30%35.87%-5.30%26.04%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and VUG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2006

0.91

The correlation between QQEW and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQEW vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQEW
VUG

Technology

55.9%
53.5%

Healthcare

14.7%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.2%

Communication Services

10.3%
17.3%

Industrials

3.3%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Energy

-

0.4%

Financial Services

-

4.3%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Technology

QQEW
55.9%
VUG
53.5%

Healthcare

QQEW
14.7%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QQEW
12.2%
VUG
12.2%

Communication Services

QQEW
10.3%
VUG
17.3%

Industrials

QQEW
3.3%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

QQEW
2.0%
VUG
1.5%

Real Estate

QQEW
1.6%
VUG
1.0%

Basic Materials

QQEW

-

VUG
0.6%

Energy

QQEW

-

VUG
0.4%

Financial Services

QQEW

-

VUG
4.3%

Utilities

QQEW

-

VUG
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQEW vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQEW
QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQEW vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQEWVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.77

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.40

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.69

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.09

5.92

-1.83

QQEW vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQEWVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.77

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.68

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.85

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.62

-0.08

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQEWVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-50.68%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-16.53%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-22.85%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-35.61%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

-35.61%

+3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.51%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-7.09%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

4.71%

+0.42%

Volatility

QQEW vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that QQEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQEWVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

3.83%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

12.11%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

15.84%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

22.22%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

21.44%

-0.57%

QQEW vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQEW vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
0.28%0.41%0.57%0.70%0.66%0.24%0.34%0.48%0.56%0.48%0.73%0.61%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQEW and VUG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQEW has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 14.57% for QQEW. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQEW.

VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.28% for QQEW.

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQEW and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer