QQEW vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QQEW (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQEW is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQEW returned 13.90%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QQEW charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

QQEW vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, QQEW has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 13.90%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.

QQEW

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -1.45%
• 6M: 11.69%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 1Y: 15.81%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 13.90%
• ALL TIME*: 11.28%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 18.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund	$5.19M	$5.28M	$5.99M
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$247.66M	$249.87M	$339.91M

QQEW vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund	9.30%	14.22%	7.00%	33.31%	-24.59%	17.75%	37.30%	35.87%	-5.30%	26.04%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.99%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and SCHG is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.92

The correlation between QQEW and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQEW vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQEW	SCHG
Technology	57.7%	44.0%
Healthcare	15.4%	9.9%
Communication Services	11.5%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	1.9%
Industrials	3.8%	7.6%
Real Estate	1.6%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.6%
Energy	-	0.9%
Financial Services	-	7.7%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

QQEW vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQEW

QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 30
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 29
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 30

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQEW vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQEW	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	0.82	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.20	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.15	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	0.83	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.63	2.62	+0.01

QQEW vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQEW	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.16%	-34.59%	-23.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.74%	-16.41%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.43%	-23.39%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.12%	-34.59%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.12%	-34.59%	+2.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-3.10%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.26%	-5.19%	-3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.36%	5.19%	+0.17%

Volatility

QQEW vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQEW	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	4.32%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.46%	12.90%	+2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.43%	16.67%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.03%	22.42%	-1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.91%	21.59%	-0.68%

QQEW vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQEW vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund	0.20%	0.41%	0.57%	0.70%	0.66%	0.24%	0.34%	0.48%	0.56%	0.48%	0.73%	0.61%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQEW and SCHG in my portfolio?

QQEW and SCHG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQEW or SCHG?

QQEW has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to SCHG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, QQEW or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.27% vs 13.90% for QQEW. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQEW or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.27% return vs 13.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQEW or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQEW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQEW or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.20% for QQEW.

What is the main difference between QQEW and SCHG?

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.