QQA vs. XRMI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. QQA is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 28.19% vs 9.03% for XRMI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

QQA vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.66% return.

QQA

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 9.03%
• 3Y*: 6.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQA vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	12.34%	17.24%	5.92%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	1.66%	4.60%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and XRMI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024	0.64

The correlation between QQA and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQA vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQA	XRMI
Technology	58.7%	39.5%
Communication Services	14.3%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	4.6%
Healthcare	3.7%	8.5%
Industrials	2.6%	7.9%
Utilities	1.2%	2.7%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.7%
Energy	0.5%	3.1%
Financial Services	0.2%	11.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

QQA vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQA vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQA	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.65	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.30	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	1.81	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	7.28	+6.62

QQA vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQA vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQA	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-15.31%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-5.02%	-3.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-0.52%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-5.87%	+3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.24%	+0.79%

Volatility

QQA vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.71%. This indicates that QQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQA	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	1.71%	+4.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	4.44%	+6.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.95%	5.52%	+8.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	6.91%	+11.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	6.91%	+11.68%

QQA vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQA vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, less than XRMI's 12.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.70%	9.78%	4.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.73%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQA and XRMI in my portfolio?

QQA and XRMI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQA or XRMI?

QQA has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to XRMI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

Which ETF is better, QQA or XRMI?

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 28.19% vs 9.03% for XRMI. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQA or XRMI?

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 28.19% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQA or XRMI?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XRMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQA or XRMI?

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.73%, compared with 9.70% for QQA.

What is the main difference between QQA and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.60% for XRMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.