QQA vs. QYLD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Invesco, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. QQA is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 23.36% vs 21.61% for QYLD. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QQA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

QQA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 9.77% return.

QQA

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: 1.51%
• 6M: 12.57%
• YTD: 13.41%
• 1Y: 23.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.20%

QYLD

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 8.36%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 13.49%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: 9.76%
• ALL TIME*: 8.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	$6.82M	$6.97M	$6.88M
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	$79.91M	$78.00M	$98.98M

QQA vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	13.41%	17.24%	5.92%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	9.77%	9.28%	8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and QYLD is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024	0.87

The correlation between QQA and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQA vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQA	QYLD
Technology	60.9%	61.4%
Communication Services	13.1%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	6.7%
Healthcare	3.6%	3.8%
Industrials	2.7%	4.4%
Utilities	1.1%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.1%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQA vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 61
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 83
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQA	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.93	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	2.75	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.40	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	3.76	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	17.35	-7.53

QQA vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQA	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-24.75%	+5.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-5.78%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-1.07%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-3.81%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	1.25%	+1.13%

Volatility

QQA vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 5.07%. This indicates that QQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQA	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	5.07%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	10.10%	+2.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	11.27%	+4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.73%	15.06%	+3.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	15.64%	+3.09%

QQA vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, less than QYLD's 11.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.76%	9.78%	4.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.67%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQA and QYLD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, QQA and QYLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQA or QYLD?

QQA has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to QYLD (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, QQA or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 23.36% vs 21.61% for QYLD. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQA or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 23.36% return vs 21.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQA or QYLD?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQA or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.67%, compared with 9.76% for QQA.

What is the main difference between QQA and QYLD?

QQA is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.