PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPX vs. SURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPX vs. SURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than SURE's 18.47% return.


QPX

1D
1.47%
1M
-0.23%
6M
5.39%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.31%

SURE

1D
1.32%
1M
1.32%
6M
14.52%
YTD
18.47%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
11.26%
ALL TIME*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$71.42K$154.86K$125.10K
$41.28K$87.18K$84.08K

QPX vs. SURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
7.94%24.12%17.28%44.63%-30.90%22.29%-0.31%
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
18.47%10.58%12.17%23.30%-11.24%23.87%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and SURE is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020

0.70

The correlation between QPX and SURE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPX vs. SURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SURE
SURE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SURE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SURE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QPX vs. SURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QPXSUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.46

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

17.02

-9.95

QPX vs. SURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the SURE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and SURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QPX vs. SURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SURE drawdown of -35.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and SURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPXSUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-35.68%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-7.10%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-21.54%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-23.75%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

0.00%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-4.80%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

1.86%

+1.43%

Volatility

QPX vs. SURE - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) at 3.29%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPXSUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

3.29%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

9.47%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.93%

13.11%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

17.08%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

17.51%

+2.50%

QPX vs. SURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SURE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPX vs. SURE - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
0.85%1.01%0.68%1.11%1.72%1.08%1.28%1.09%1.26%0.65%1.14%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


QPX and SURE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QPX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to SURE (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs SURE's -35.68%.

On 5-year performance, SURE leads with 11.06% vs 10.80% for QPX. On fees, SURE is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SURE has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SURE has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SURE is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

SURE has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SURE is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.90% for SURE.

SURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPX and SURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer