QPX vs. SPIT
QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
QPX vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 26.92% return.
QPX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.31%
SPIT
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- YTD
- 26.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $71.42K | $154.86K | $125.10K | |
| $212.31K | $271.42K | $193.26K |
QPX vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.94% | 3.30% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 26.92% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and SPIT is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QPX vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QPX | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QPX vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -12.49% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -5.71% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -2.87% | -5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility
QPX vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 26.61% | -10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 26.61% | -6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 26.61% | -6.60% |
QPX vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPX vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.66% | 7.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPX and SPIT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPIT is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPIT is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for QPX and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer