QPX vs. JQUA
QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QPX is actively managed, while JQUA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.09%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
QPX vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.16% return.
QPX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- —
QPX vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 11.10% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | 0.38% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.16% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and JQUA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QPX and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
QPX vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QPX
JQUA
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
QPX
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
QPX
JQUA
Communication Services
QPX
JQUA
Real Estate
QPX
JQUA
Industrials
QPX
JQUA
Financial Services
QPX
JQUA
Healthcare
QPX
JQUA
Energy
QPX
JQUA
Basic Materials
QPX
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
QPX
JQUA
Utilities
QPX
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
JQUA
QPX vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QPX | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.20 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 13.48 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPX | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.03 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.90 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
QPX vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -32.92% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -7.13% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -16.81% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -22.47% | -12.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.28% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -4.16% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.69% | +1.21% |
Volatility
QPX vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.82%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 2.82% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 8.31% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 11.20% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 15.61% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 17.99% | +2.00% |
QPX vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPX vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPX and JQUA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QPX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to JQUA (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.92% vs 13.09% for QPX. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.12% for JQUA.
QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QPX and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer