PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPX vs. DWSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPX vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than DWSH's 0.85% return.


QPX

1D
-0.66%
1M
7.22%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.56%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*

DWSH

1D
2.36%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.07%
1Y
-10.40%
3Y*
-4.14%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPX vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
10.87%24.12%17.28%44.63%-30.90%22.29%0.38%
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
0.85%-2.57%5.98%-22.04%17.45%-25.74%-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and DWSH is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020

-0.61

The correlation between QPX and DWSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.63 (5 years) to -0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QPX vs. DWSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QPX
DWSH

Technology

49.8%
-25.6%

Consumer Cyclical

25.6%
-12.6%

Communication Services

14.9%
-4.5%

Real Estate

6.4%
-5.9%

Industrials

1.0%
-13.5%

Financial Services

0.9%
-8.9%

Healthcare

0.6%
-12.0%

Energy

0.3%
-1.1%

Basic Materials

0.3%
-0.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
-7.7%

Utilities

0.1%

-

Technology

QPX
49.8%
DWSH
-25.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QPX
25.6%
DWSH
-12.6%

Communication Services

QPX
14.9%
DWSH
-4.5%

Real Estate

QPX
6.4%
DWSH
-5.9%

Industrials

QPX
1.0%
DWSH
-13.5%

Financial Services

QPX
0.9%
DWSH
-8.9%

Healthcare

QPX
0.6%
DWSH
-12.0%

Energy

QPX
0.3%
DWSH
-1.1%

Basic Materials

QPX
0.3%
DWSH
-0.8%

Consumer Defensive

QPX
0.2%
DWSH
-7.7%

Utilities

QPX
0.1%
DWSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPX vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPX vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QPXDWSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.93

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

-0.58

+3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

-0.88

+12.07

QPX vs. DWSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the DWSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and DWSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QPXDWSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

-0.50

+2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

-0.06

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

-0.43

+1.10

Drawdowns

QPX vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum DWSH drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and DWSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPXDWSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-82.73%

+47.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-18.08%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-29.23%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-32.87%

-1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-81.25%

+80.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-63.61%

+55.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

11.82%

-8.92%

Volatility

QPX vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 4.16%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPXDWSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

6.08%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

13.93%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

21.19%

-7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

25.93%

-6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

31.22%

-11.23%

QPX vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPX vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.26%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QPX and DWSH have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWSH has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to QPX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs DWSH's -82.73%.

On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.04% vs -1.61% for DWSH. On fees, QPX is cheaper at 1.46% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.04% return vs -1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QPX is cheaper with a 1.46% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 3.67% for DWSH.

QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPX and DWSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer