QPX vs. DWSH
QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.04%/yr vs -1.61%/yr for DWSH. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for DWSH.
Performance
QPX vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than DWSH's 0.85% return.
QPX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 32.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QPX vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 10.87% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | 0.38% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 0.85% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and DWSH is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | -0.61 |
The correlation between QPX and DWSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.63 (5 years) to -0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QPX vs. DWSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QPX
DWSH
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Technology
QPX
DWSH
Consumer Cyclical
QPX
DWSH
Communication Services
QPX
DWSH
Real Estate
QPX
DWSH
Industrials
QPX
DWSH
Financial Services
QPX
DWSH
Healthcare
QPX
DWSH
Energy
QPX
DWSH
Basic Materials
QPX
DWSH
Consumer Defensive
QPX
DWSH
Utilities
QPX
DWSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
DWSH
QPX vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QPX | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.93 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | -0.58 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | -0.88 | +12.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPX | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | -0.50 | +2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | -0.06 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | -0.43 | +1.10 |
Drawdowns
QPX vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum DWSH drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and DWSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -82.73% | +47.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -18.08% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -29.23% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -32.87% | -1.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -81.25% | +80.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -63.61% | +55.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 11.82% | -8.92% |
Volatility
QPX vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 4.16%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 6.08% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 13.93% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 21.19% | -7.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 25.93% | -6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 31.22% | -11.23% |
QPX vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPX vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.26% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPX and DWSH have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to QPX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs DWSH's -82.73%.
On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.04% vs -1.61% for DWSH. On fees, QPX is cheaper at 1.46% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.04% return vs -1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QPX is cheaper with a 1.46% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 3.67% for DWSH.
QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QPX and DWSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer