DWSH vs. SQQQ
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). DWSH is actively managed, while SQQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWSH returned -0.92%/yr vs -46.89%/yr for SQQQ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.31% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- -3.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- —
SQQQ
- 1D
- 9.83%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -40.31%
- 6M
- -37.80%
- 1Y
- -61.11%
- 3Y*
- -53.86%
- 5Y*
- -46.89%
- 10Y*
- -56.24%
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 2.65% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | -25.27% | 22.37% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.31% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | 30.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and SQQQ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2018 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DWSH and SQQQ has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWSH
SQQQ
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Utilities
DWSH
-
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Energy
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
DWSH
SQQQ
Consumer Defensive
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Industrials
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Technology
DWSH
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
SQQQ
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWSH | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.78 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | -0.96 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | -1.81 | +1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -100.00% | +17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -63.52% | +48.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.23% | -92.51% | +63.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | -97.27% | +64.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.92% | -100.00% | +19.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -92.73% | +29.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.99% | 36.37% | -26.38% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 6.64%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.69%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 26.69% | -20.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.32% | 43.33% | -29.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 53.65% | -32.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 67.53% | -41.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.15% | 66.47% | -35.32% |
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than SQQQ's 11.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.15% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.44% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.69%) compared to DWSH (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 5-year performance, DWSH leads with -0.92% vs -46.89% for SQQQ. On fees, SQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -0.92% return vs -46.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 6.15% for DWSH.
DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.95% for SQQQ.
DWSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer