QPX vs. DGRO
QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QPX is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 10.80%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for DGRO. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
QPX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.79% return.
QPX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.31%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.57M | $103.25M | $110.55M | |
| $71.42K | $154.86K | $125.10K |
QPX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.94% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | -0.31% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 13.79% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and DGRO is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QPX and DGRO has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
DGRO
QPX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QPX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.48 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.83 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 14.91 | -7.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QPX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -35.10% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -6.47% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -14.03% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -19.31% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -1.01% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -3.41% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 1.66% | +1.63% |
Volatility
QPX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.88%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 2.88% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 7.12% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 9.54% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 13.79% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 16.58% | +3.43% |
QPX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.89% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QPX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DGRO (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 11.15% vs 10.80% for QPX. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 11.15% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QPX and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer