PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPX vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return.


QPX

1D
-0.66%
1M
7.22%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.56%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
10.87%24.12%17.28%44.63%-30.90%22.29%0.38%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and DGRO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020

0.72

The correlation between QPX and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QPX vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QPX
DGRO

Technology

49.8%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

25.6%
5.7%

Communication Services

14.9%
0.1%

Real Estate

6.4%

-

Industrials

1.0%
10.8%

Financial Services

0.9%
21.2%

Healthcare

0.6%
16.4%

Energy

0.3%
5.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
11.5%

Utilities

0.1%
6.9%

Technology

QPX
49.8%
DGRO
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QPX
25.6%
DGRO
5.7%

Communication Services

QPX
14.9%
DGRO
0.1%

Real Estate

QPX
6.4%
DGRO

-

Industrials

QPX
1.0%
DGRO
10.8%

Financial Services

QPX
0.9%
DGRO
21.2%

Healthcare

QPX
0.6%
DGRO
16.4%

Energy

QPX
0.3%
DGRO
5.6%

Basic Materials

QPX
0.3%
DGRO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

QPX
0.2%
DGRO
11.5%

Utilities

QPX
0.1%
DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QPXDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.50

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

13.52

-2.33

QPX vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QPXDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.39

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.77

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.76

-0.09

Drawdowns

QPX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPXDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-35.10%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-6.47%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-14.03%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-19.31%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.28%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-3.44%

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.67%

+1.23%

Volatility

QPX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPXDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

2.21%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

6.91%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

9.48%

+4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

13.82%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

16.62%

+3.37%

QPX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QPX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QPX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.04% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPX and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer